Condition Coverage Sonarqube

I am using bullseye to generate coverage reports and then the sonar cxx community plugin to import coverage data into SonarQube SonarQube does not show which of the condition is covered/uncovered.

Condition coverage sonarqube. As overall coverage must now be computed by the platform based on UT and IT measures (see SONAR62), the "Overall condition coverage" related metrics should be deprecated because those metrics cannot be deduced from their UT & IT equivalents => Only tools like JaCoCo knows how to merge UT & IT coverage results and give the right information. Forloop conditions should be true at least once Bug. But, as for longlived branches, we will apply a threshold conditions on coverage and duplication should be ignored if less than lines were updated When it's the case, an explanation message should be displayed close to the status (see SONAR9352 for the details) The message should say the following.

The coverage data displayed and computed (Coverage, Conditions Coverage metrics) in SonarQube/SonarCloud are closer to reality;. When multiple tools report condition coverage on a line, the handling of that corner case may result in a pessimistic view of the coverage, but is guaranteed not to result in an overlyoptimistic view CPP1663 Support many coverage reports with SonarQube 62 Open;. See the Defining Quality Gates section below for more information on defining conditions Ideally, all projects will use the same quality gate, but that's not always practical.

Condition coverage branch_coverage On each line of code containing some boolean expressions, the condition coverage simply answers the following question 'Has each boolean expression been evaluated both to true and false?' This is the density of possible conditions in flow control structures that have been followed during unit tests execution. Finally, on the Sonarqube dashboard, in section Measures/Coverage, only test MyExampleTestswift is visible Percentage unit tests coverage is not shown Sonar reports coveragexml and TESTreportxml are generated properly. Null pointers should not be dereferenced Bug;.

To answer this question, you define a set of conditions against which projects are measured For example No new blocker issues;. Code coverage on new code greater than 80%;. A condition is shown to affect a decision's outcome independently by varying just that condition while holding fixed all other possible conditions The condition/decision criterion does not guarantee the coverage of all conditions in the module because in many test cases , some conditions of a decision are masked by the other conditions.

SonarQube doesn't run your tests or generate reports It only imports pregenerated reports Below you'll find language and toolspecific analysis parameters for importing coverage and execution reports In the Guides category of the SonarSource Community forum you might find instructions on generating these reports. To answer this question, you define a set of conditions against which projects are measured For example No new blocker issues;. Forloop conditions should be true at least once Bug.

The unit tests are written and executed with JUnit 5 Regular code coverage is measured using JaCoCo which reports 100% lines and condition coverage On top of that, Pitest is used to perform mutation testing The mutation tests run by Pitest report 0 surviving mutations SonarQube The project has a SonarQube analysis. Code coverage is an important quality metric that can be imported in SonarQube. SonarQube can increase NET Core code quality, especially when used with Coverlet Coverlet is a crossplatform code coverage tool for NET Core There is a condition in the divide method.

SonarQube doesn't run your tests or generate reports It only imports pregenerated reports Below you'll find language and toolspecific analysis parameters for importing coverage and execution reports In the Guides category of the SonarSource Community forum you might find instructions on generating these reports. Sonarqube allows for individual files to be excluded from code coverage by adding patterns in the sonarcoverageexclusions key This can be done on a project level by adding them in the UI and even in acsproj file by specifying a SonarQubeSetting element. On each line of code containing some boolean expressions, the condition coverage simply answers the following question 'Has each boolean expression been evaluated both to true and false?' This is the density of possible conditions in flow control structures that have been followed during unit tests execution.

Followup on my previous guide on enabling code coverage in Azure Devops and SonarQube with multiple NET Core test projects Simplified solution in yml that fixes SonarCloud showing too many conditions rvmcom About Fixing SonarCloud code coverage condition count with multiple NET Core test projects. Code coverage on new code greater than 80%;. From the web interface, the Quality Gates tab is where we can access all the defined quality gates By default, SonarQube way came preinstalled with the server The default configuration for SonarQube way flags the code as failed if the coverage on new code is less than 80%;.

This way, you can configure a quality gate based on your own requirements, ensuring bad code. The coverage data displayed and computed (Coverage, Conditions Coverage metrics) in SonarQube/SonarCloud are closer to reality;. Automatically detect Bugs, Vulnerabilities, and Code Smells in HTML and JSF/JSP with SonarSource's HTML analysis This opensource HTML and JSF/JSP static code analysis is available in SonarQube and SonarCloud.

Run with coverage Set coverage in run configurations In IntelliJ IDEA, you can create multiple run/debug configurations and specify coverage options for each of them depending on your needs Run configurations are currently being redesigned some configurations are updated and some are still in the old design. Followup on my previous guide on enabling code coverage in Azure Devops and SonarQube with multiple NET Core test projects Simplified solution in yml that fixes SonarCloud showing too many conditions rvmcom About Fixing SonarCloud code coverage condition count with multiple NET Core test projects. However, although my "opencoverxml" includes branchCoverage numbers, the SonarQube server is not showing anything for branch coverage For overall file statistics "Uncovered Conditions" is a dash (–) and for new code "Conditions to Cover on New Code" and "Uncovered Conditions on New Code" are both 0.

Condition coverage branch_coverage On each line of code containing some boolean expressions, the condition coverage simply answers the following question 'Has each boolean expression been evaluated both to true and false?' This is the density of possible conditions in flow control structures that have been followed during unit tests execution. How does Sonarqube calculate the ‘Coverage’ Line Coverage and Branch Coverage in Sonarqube are used directly from the coverage plugin, ie Jacoco In addition to Line and Branch Coverage, Sonarqube further calculates a ‘Coverage’ to provide a single metrics for the code coverage It is a combined metric from the line and branch coverage. Focuses on new code – The Pull Request quality gate only uses your project's quality gate conditions that apply to "on New Code" metrics Assigns a status – Each Pull Request shows a quality gate status reflecting whether it Passed or Failed Pull request analyses on SonarQube are deleted automatically after 30 days with no analysis.

A drop of your overall coverage a line that was considered as fully covered will now be accurately considered as partially covered if some conditions are not covered. Everything works fine with the Coverage results C# and TS coverage is merged nicely in SonarQube But the Execution results seem impossible to combine With the configuration above, the sonar scanner reports that the test files referenced in the "Generic Execution" report are unknown. SonarSource delivers what is probably the best static code analysis you can find for TypeScript Based on Microsoft's opensource TypeScript compiler frontend, it uses the most advanced techniques (pattern matching, program flow analysis) to analyze code and find Code Smells, Bugs, and Security Vulnerabilities.

The ternary operator should not return the same value regardless of the condition Bug "=" should not be used instead of "=" Bug "NaN" should not be used in comparisons Bug;. The main problem with default SonarQube analysis is that it provides only Unit Test coverage, while Integration Test even if present and running are ignored, while we would like to have a detail of the coverage of each phase together with overall final coverage. © 0021, SonarSource SA, SwitzerlandAll content is copyright protected SONARSOURCE, SONARLINT, SONARQUBE and SONARCLOUD are trademarks of SonarSource SA All.

SonarQube version 63 Date February 18 Main concepts Quality Gates Set of boolean conditions based on measure thresholds against which projects are measured during a period Blocker Issues equals 0 Code Coverage is greater than 80% Rules rules are executed on source to generate issuesThree basic types of rules Reliability, Maintainability and Security. Conditionally executed code should be reachable Bug;. Because SonarQube names the Main Branch "master" by default, you may have to rename it before running analysis again See the Jenkins CI Integration page for more information Updated NET code coverage The code coverage for NET projects now takes into account the branch/condition coverage in addition to the line coverage The coverage of.

Hi guys, I'm trying to understand the meaning of "condition coverage" in SonarQube When bitwise OR and AND operators only are used, all the boolean expressions are always evaluated The number of conditions for SonarQube is always 2. Condition Coverage or expression coverage is a testing method used to test and evaluate the variables or subexpressions in the conditional statement The goal of condition coverage is to check individual outcomes for each logical condition Condition coverage offers better sensitivity to the control flow than decision coverage. In order to ensure complete Condition coverage criteria for the above example, A, B and C should be evaluated at least once against "true" and "false" So, in our example, the 3 following tests would be sufficient for 100% Condition coverage testing.

However, although my "opencoverxml" includes branchCoverage numbers, the SonarQube server is not showing anything for branch coverage For overall file statistics "Uncovered Conditions" is a dash (–) and for new code "Conditions to Cover on New Code" and "Uncovered Conditions on New Code" are both 0. See the Defining Quality Gates section below for more information on defining conditions Ideally, all projects will use the same quality gate, but that's not always practical. Regions All Europe, Middle East & Africa North America Latin America AsiaPacific.

SonarQube reports 0% coverage for interface files, whereas interfaces can't actually be tested #169 JaSpr opened this issue Aug 4, 17 · 5 comments Comments. Discover all the features available in SonarQube 79 LTS The definitive guide to a version designed for LongTerm Support and built for months of reliability. Conditionally executed code should be reachable Bug;.

In order to ensure complete Condition coverage criteria for the above example, A, B and C should be evaluated at least once against "true" and "false" So, in our example, the 3 following tests would be sufficient for 100% Condition coverage testing. Thank you for your request A SonarSource representative will get in touch with you shortly In the meantime, you can prepare your setup Install SonarQube Developer Edition. SonarQube reports 0% coverage for interface files, whereas interfaces can't actually be tested #169 JaSpr opened this issue Aug 4, 17 · 5 comments Comments.

Null pointers should not be dereferenced Bug;. Code coverage is an important quality metric that can be imported in SonarQube. A drop of your overall coverage a line that was considered as fully covered will now be accurately considered as partially covered if some conditions are not covered.

SonarQube finds the possible security weakness in the code by implementing basic penetration testing techniques Concept Of Quality Gates Quality Gates are conditions set on various parameters like bug count, code coverage etc to be checked on build of a project. SonarQube finds the possible security weakness in the code by implementing basic penetration testing techniques Concept Of Quality Gates Quality Gates are conditions set on various parameters like bug count, code coverage etc to be checked on build of a project. SonarQube is a server that allows to track coverage statistics, find bugs in your code and more It is languageagnostic and can be installed on premises, and you can integrate it easily with Buddy For the sake of example, in this article we will use JavaScript as a sample code language.

SONAR4030 Please Provide System Test Coverage Metrics and Relevant Overall. Inside SonarQube\bin folder , nested folders are available for different OS, choose accordingly and set the path Sonarqube Quality Gate Sonarqube Quality Gate is defined as a set of threshold measures set on our projects like Security Rating, Code Coverage, Maintainability Rating , Reliability Rating etc. Starting from 62, SonarQube supports "force coverage to 0", which marks as uncovered executable lines in files that don't show up in any coverage reports (That's assuming the underlying code analyzers support the feature, and Java and JavaScript already do).

Percentage of duplicated lines on new code is greater than 3. In the first branch we have 2 covered conditions and we know the branch as never been true, however we dont know which condition have been evaluated to true Ok in this case both have been evaluated to true, but when having 1/4 or 3/4 in there than its impossible to know A good way of presenting this would be,. I am using bullseye to generate coverage reports and then the sonar cxx community plugin to import coverage data into SonarQube SonarQube does not show which of the condition is covered/uncovered.

Run with coverage Set coverage in run configurations In IntelliJ IDEA, you can create multiple run/debug configurations and specify coverage options for each of them depending on your needs Run configurations are currently being redesigned some configurations are updated and some are still in the old design. SonarQube is an excellent tool for measuring code quality, using static analysis to find code smells, bugs, vulnerabilities, and poor test coverage Rather than manually analysing the reports, why not automate the process by integrating SonarQube with your Jenkins continuous integration pipeline?. To get full condition coverage, you need an additional test test(a == 1, b == 1) Edit Both tools calculate the coverage using the branch information per line I run a test on some of my code, and the number of "conditions to cover" (Sonarqube) matches the number of total "Branches" in Jacoco report but I used the most recent versions for jacoco and Sonarqube/sonarjava So apart from the name, but measures are/should be the same.

SonarQube fits with your existing tools and proactively raises a hand when the quality or security of your codebase is at risk Read more CI/CD integration Jenkins, Azure DevOps server and many others Feedback during Code Review SonarQube can analyse branches of your repo, and notify you directly in your Pull Requests!. Focuses on new code – The Pull Request quality gate only uses your project's quality gate conditions that apply to "on New Code" metrics Assigns a status – Each Pull Request shows a quality gate status reflecting whether it Passed or Failed Pull request analyses on SonarQube are deleted automatically after 30 days with no analysis. The ternary operator should not return the same value regardless of the condition Bug "=" should not be used instead of "=" Bug "NaN" should not be used in comparisons Bug;.

SonarQube is a server that allows to track coverage statistics, find bugs in your code and more It is languageagnostic and can be installed on premises, and you can integrate it easily with Buddy. It provides coverage for line, statement, function, decision, multi condition, modified condition/decision coverage (MC/DC), and condition coverage What is SonarQube code coverage?. SonarSource's Java analysis has a great coverage of wellestablished quality standards This capability is available in Eclipse, IntelliJ and VSCode for developers (SonarLint) as well as throughout the development chain for automated code review with selfhosted SonarQube or cloudbased SonarCloud.

In this post we will look at SonarQube Interview questions Examples are provided with explanations What is SonarQube ASonar is a web based code quality analysis tool for Maven based Java projectsIt covers a wide area of code quality check points which include Architecture & Design, Complexity, Duplications, Coding Rules, Potential Bugs, Unit Test etc. Condition coverage branch_coverage On each line of code containing some boolean expressions, the condition coverage simply answers the following question 'Has each boolean expression been evaluated both to true and false?' This is the density of possible conditions in flow control structures that have been followed during unit tests execution. Sonarqubecoveragebranch_coverage (gauge) Condition coverage Shown as percent sonarqubecoverageconditions_to_cover (gauge) Conditions to cover sonarqubecoveragecoverage (gauge) Coverage by tests Shown as percent sonarqubecoverageline_coverage (gauge) Line coverage Shown as percent sonarqubecoveragelines_to_cover (gauge) Lines to cover.